Central Circulation Tube Evaporator

√  Low operating costs

The installation space of MVR evaporation crystallizers is approximately twice that of conventional multi-effect evaporation crystallizers, and the operating costs are significantly lower than those of conventional multi-effect evaporation crystallizers.

√  Automatic control operating system

To avoid operator errors or malfunctions caused by incorrect operation, an automatic control operating system to protect the equipment is necessary.

√  MVR evaporators save over 60% more energy than five-effect evaporators.

Traditional evaporators use fresh steam as an energy source, while MVR mechanical vapor compression evaporators consume electricity as energy. Evaporating one ton of water typically consumes 17-23 kWh of electricity, and for materials with a relatively small boiling point elevation, the electricity consumption can be below 20 kWh per ton of water. The extent of energy savings is closely related to the local price of fresh steam and electricity. Typically, MVR evaporators save over 60% more energy than five-effect evaporators.

√  Simple structure, fewer utility requirements

MVR evaporation crystallizers have a simple structure and require fewer utility supports.

√  Selection of crystallizers

Depending on the type of crystals precipitated, forced circulation crystallizers (FC), Oslo (OSL) crystallizers, or DTB crystallizers can be selected.