MVR Mechanical Vapor Recompression Evaporator
Contact Info
- Add:湖北省黄石市黄金山工业新区金山大道188号, Zip: 435000
- Contact: 刘先生
- Tel:435000
- Email:cnrenzhe@126.com
Other Products
Performance Characteristics
01. MVR energy-saving evaporator technology is currently the most advanced evaporator technology, requiring only a minimal amount of live steam (a small amount is needed during startup, and almost none is required during normal operation), greatly reducing enterprise operating costs and environmental pollution.
02. Due to the use of a compressor to provide the heat source, the temperature difference is much smaller compared to traditional evaporators, enabling gentle evaporation, significantly improving product quality, and reducing scaling.
03. No condenser or only a very small condenser is needed. The structure and process are very simple, fully automated, capable of continuous operation, safe and reliable.
04. The equipment is equipped with CIP cleaning pipelines, enabling in-place cleaning. The entire system is easy to operate with no dead corners.
05. This evaporator operates at low temperatures (evaporation temperature 50°C-100°C) without foam generation. The material liquid is uniform, does not escape, is not prone to coking, and minimizes heat-induced denaturation of the material.
06.MVR evaporator requires about twice the installation space of a conventional multi-effect evaporator, and the equipment investment is higher, but the operating costs are much lower than those of conventional multi-effect evaporators.
07. To avoid operator errors or malfunctions caused by incorrect operation, an automatic control system to protect the equipment is necessary.
08. Traditional multi-effect evaporators use fresh steam as an energy source. For example, a five-effect evaporator typically consumes 0.23 tons of fresh steam to evaporate 1 ton of water. MVR mechanical vapor compression evaporators consume electrical energy, typically using 15-27 kWh to evaporate 1 ton of water. For materials with a small boiling point elevation, the electricity consumption can be below 20 kWh per ton of water. The degree of energy savings is closely related to the local price of fresh steam and electricity. For example, if steam costs 180 RMB/ton and electricity costs 0.7 RMB/kWh, compared to a five-effect evaporator, the energy cost saving per ton of water evaporated is 0.23*180 - 20*0.7 = 27.4 RMB. With an evaporation capacity of 100 tons, operating 24 hours a day for 330 days a year, the annual energy saving would be 27.4*100*24*330 = 21,700,800 RMB. MVR evaporators save over 60% energy compared to five-effect evaporators.
09. The price of an MVR mechanical vapor compression evaporator is about twice that of a multi-effect evaporator. For new projects, the additional investment for an MVR can generally be recovered within 300 operating days. For energy-saving retrofit projects replacing an existing multi-effect evaporator with an MVR, the investment can typically be recovered within 500 operating days.
- In special regions where steam costs are very low and electricity prices are very high, the economic advantages of MVR mechanical vapor compression evaporators are not significant, and their use is not recommended.
Common Model Specifications: NMVR-XX
XX - Water evaporation capacity (t/h): Minimum 0.2, Maximum 600, specific according to customer requirements.
Application Scope:
Suitable for evaporation, concentration, and crystallization of various materials, especially products with a small boiling point rise (BPR) or easily evaporable dilute materials.
Working Principle
Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) evaporators utilize the secondary steam generated in the evaporator. This steam is compressed by a compressor, increasing its pressure and temperature, and thus its enthalpy. It is then sent to the evaporator's heating chamber to be used as heating steam, maintaining the boiling state of the material liquid, while the heating steam itself condenses into water. This process fully utilizes steam that would otherwise be wasted, recovering latent heat and improving thermal efficiency. The economy of live steam is equivalent to that of a 30-effect multi-effect evaporation system, reducing the demand for external heating and cooling resources, lowering energy consumption, and reducing pollution.
System Composition: Composed of a heater, separator (crystallizer), compressor, vacuum pump, circulation pump, operation platform, electrical instrument control cabinet, valves, piping, and other systems. The structure is very simple. Comparison of Annual Energy Consumption Costs Between Conventional Multi-Effect Concentration Equipment and MVR Concentration Equipment Energy Consumption Comparison (Example) Evaporation capacity: 40 tons/H, Steam price: 170 RMB/ton, Electricity price: 0.6 RMB/KwH, Annual operating days: 24 hours/day, 330 days/year
Power Consumption of MVR Evaporators MVR evaporators hardly use any steam, but their electricity consumption is much higher than that of conventional multi-effect evaporators. In other words, the primary energy source for MVR is electricity. The power consumption of the main motor of the MVR (Mechanical Vapor Recompression fan) mainly depends on the heat exchange area of the evaporator, the evaporation temperature, and the characteristics of the material itself. MVR Evaporation and Concentration Equipment ● Evaporation and concentration equipment that uses MVR (Mechanical Vapor Recompression) to compress all secondary steam into heating steam for cyclic reuse. ● MVR evaporators require about twice the installation space of conventional multi-effect evaporators, and the equipment investment is higher, but the operating costs are much lower. ● To avoid operator errors or malfunctions caused by incorrect operation, an automatic control system to protect the equipment is necessary. Several Forms of MVR Evaporators Depending on the material characteristics of the concentrated product and the final concentration level, three main types are supplied: CSFM Suitable for materials with a small boiling point elevation (BPE), where a single compression of the secondary steam by the MVR meets the design requirements. Compared to the CDFM form, it requires less installation space and has lower equipment investment costs. CDFM Used when CSFM cannot achieve the desired concentration. It involves compressing the secondary steam twice or more to obtain heating steam at a higher temperature than CSFM. CDFM requires more installation space and has higher equipment investment costs compared to CSFM. Depending on the characteristics of the evaporation and concentration product (BPE, viscosity, discharge concentration requirements, presence of crystallization, etc.), other forms of CDFM can be provided, such as connecting two compressors in series. Combined MVR and Multi-Effect Form This is the most energy-efficient combination, which became popular in Europe and America from the late 1990s and entered the Chinese market in 2009. It is currently the best design process for large and medium-sized energy-saving evaporators and represents the development direction for large energy-saving evaporators. It prioritizes green energy-saving concepts while ensuring reliability, incorporating high-performance energy-saving heat transfer technology units such as plate evaporation and falling film evaporation. Various configurations can be generated based on the material's condition, production capacity, system energy-saving performance requirements, and investment constraints. Performance Comparison Table of Several Evaporation Equipment Types Evaporation of Traditional Chinese Medicine Extracts Product Advantages Specification: NMVR-3 ● Evaporation temperature: 75°C ● Steam consumption: 0 tons/hour (no fresh steam required) ● Electricity consumption per ton of water evaporated: 25 kWh - 30 kWh ● Vacuum low-temperature evaporation ● Fully automated, unmanned operation ● Low energy consumption / Good stability / Low noise ● Uses distilled water for online cleaning (CIP) ● No cooling circulating water required Energy Consumption of Double-Effect Evaporation Concentrator ● Steam consumption A 3 t/h double-effect concentrator consumes 1.71 tons of steam per hour. Steam cost per ton of water evaporated: 1.71 * 200 / 3 = 114 RMB ● Electricity consumption Vacuum pump 5.5 kW, cooling circulation pump and cooling tower motor power 11 kW. Electricity cost per ton of water evaporated: 16.5 * 80% * 0.8 / 3 = 3.52 RMB/ton evaporated water ● Loss of circulating cooling water equivalent: approx. 3.48 RMB/ton evaporated water ● Comprehensive cost per ton of water evaporated for double-effect evaporation equipment: 114 + 3.52 + 3.48 = 121.0 RMB MVR Energy Consumption Since MVR uses very little steam (depending on feed temperature), evaporating one ton of water uses about 15 kg of steam: 0.015 * 200 = 3.0 RMB. Cooling water usage is also very low, calculated at 1 RMB water cost per ton of water evaporated. Based on one month of usage statistics, for a 3 t/h evaporation capacity system, the average electricity consumption is 27 kWh per ton of water evaporated, costing 21.6 RMB. The comprehensive cost for MVR to evaporate one ton of water is 3 + 1 + 21.6 = 25.6 RMB. Annual Savings with MVR Assuming one MVR concentrator evaporates 72 tons of water per day and operates 300 days per year, the annual evaporation volume is 21,600 tons/year. The annual savings would be 2.147 million RMB. Comparison between using MVR and traditional double-effect Per ton of water evaporated, the MVR concentrator saves 121 - 25.6 = 99.4 RMB compared to the double-effect falling film evaporator, representing an energy saving rate of about 80%.
Product Parameters
| Industry Category | Machinery |
|---|---|
| Product Category | |
| Brand: | 佳境 |
| Spec: | MVR |
| Stock: | |
| Origin: | China / Hubei / Huangshishi |