Evaluation Criteria for Specialized, Refined, Unique, and Innovative Enterprises

In recent years, the state has fully supported specialized, refined, unique, and innovative enterprises, issuing a series of relevant policy documents. Many enterprises have seized this opportunity to successfully obtain the specialized, refined, unique, and innovative certification, enjoying tangible policy benefits. However, this has also intensified the competition for certification and reassessment, significantly increasing the difficulty.

Under these circumstances, for enterprises to stand out in the fierce competition, they must not only improve their overall scores and meet hard indicators but also strive to excel in numerous subjective and objective conditions.

Specialized, Refined, Unique, and Innovative Evaluation Details

(I) Objective Score Assessment Dimensions

The assessment of objective scores is like solving a math problem, with clear, fixed answers and scoring criteria, primarily evaluated from two key areas: finance and others:

Financial Indicators

Proportion of Main Business Revenue: This indicator measures the share of core business in the total revenue, directly reflecting the centrality and stability of the enterprise's operations.

Average Growth Rate of Main Business Revenue: This indicator reflects the growth trend of the core business, showcasing its market expansion capabilities and development potential.

Net Profit Margin: It is an important reflection of the enterprise's profitability, relating to the efficiency of cost control and revenue generation.

Asset-Liability Ratio: This indicator reflects the enterprise's financial leverage and debt repayment ability, significantly impacting its financial risk level.

R&D Expenditure: The scale of investment demonstrates the enterprise's emphasis on innovation and serves as a crucial support for its future development momentum.

Other Indicators

Years of Operation: To some extent, years of operation reflect the enterprise's operational accumulation and industry experience.

Quality Management Level: This relates to the stability and reliability of product or service quality, profoundly impacting the enterprise's market reputation and competitiveness.

Enterprise Technological Innovation and Scale Upgrade: This indicator reflects the enterprise's technological progress and scale expansion capabilities, helping to drive the enterprise to achieve developmental leaps.

Listing and Financing Status: This reflects the enterprise's recognition in the capital market and its financing ability, providing important channels for financial support for development.

Number of Valid Intellectual Properties: Highlights the enterprise's efforts to protect innovation achievements and its technological reserve strength.

R&D Institution Level: Reflects the tier of the enterprise's R&D platform, closely related to its technological R&D capabilities and resource integration abilities.

(II) Subjective Score Assessment Dimensions

The assessment of subjective scores mainly relies on written explanations and supporting materials, focusing on the following aspects:

Field of Dominant Products: Considers the market prospects, competitive landscape, and strategic importance of the product's field, critically influencing the enterprise's advantages in its development track.

Digitalization Level: Reflects the enterprise's operational efficiency, management effectiveness, and innovation-driven capabilities in the information age, indicating its adaptability to contemporary development trends.

Local Characteristic Indicators: Closely integrated with regional features, such as local industrial support directions and unique resource advantages, to explore the enterprise's regional adaptability and distinctive competitiveness.

R&D Personnel: Covers aspects such as the number of personnel, quality structure, and stability of the R&D team, serving as the core intellectual source and动力保障 for the enterprise's technological innovation.

From both subjective and objective dimensions, enterprises need to plan and layout in advance. Especially for those controllable scoring points, they must go all out to secure every possible point and strive for every fraction. It is important to note that in each batch of assessments, many enterprises miss certification opportunities by just one point. This seemingly small gap actually reflects the thoroughness of the enterprise's preparations in every aspect. Therefore, enterprises should attach great importance, comprehensively examine their strengths and weaknesses, and deeply study each scoring detail. Through solid preparation and continuous effort, they should aim for higher scores to increase the probability of successful certification, steadily advancing on the path of specialized, refined, unique, and innovative development, laying a solid foundation for the enterprise's long-term growth.

If you have any questions or business inquiries, please call Ms. Huang at 15513049001. We will provide real-time online services for you.